STUDIES:
86/
“Rather than addressing those underlying conditions, … policy-makers have chosen to respond with a policy that [] stigmatizes minority residents, that has limited crime-control benefits, and that imposes large negative spillovers on disadvantaged neighborhoods."
The Consequences of Disparate Policing: Evaluating Stop and Frisk as a Modality of Urban Policing
Minnesota Law Review
Vol. 101, pp. 2397-2480,
2017
Comment on this study on its Twitter thread.